The following quote from acting legend Robert Duvall appears
in a recent AARP magazine, when asked about leaving a mark:
“In America, we’ve got
cowboys. As an actor, you don’t reinvent something like the Western. You make
it your own: “If I were in this situation, what would I do as a cattleman?”
Suddenly your fingerprints are all over the place.”
Writers are often counseled to be the new and shiny thing,
to find something different. Not saying to be old and stale, but the
opportunities available for the new and different are limited by public taste,
your agent or editor’s handle on what’s going to be next, and where your
primary skills as an author reside. Basically, it’s luck, using the definition,
“Luck is where preparation meets opportunity.” If you’re not ready, you won’t
get lucky. J. K. Rowling is the best example of this in recent literary history.
To use “luck” in connection with her success is by no means a pejorative
statement, but had she come out with Harry Potter a year earlier or a year
later, she might have sunk like a stone. That kind of success is a little like
winning the lottery: you only win if you picked the correct numbers on the right
day.
A better long-term, if less spectacular, strategy is to find
what you do best and make it your own. There’s no point in trying to climb onto
the Fifty Shades of Gray bandwagon if
you are most comfortable writing hard-boiled crime fiction. You’re not likely
to be as good at it, and that train has left the station, anyway. Find what you’re
good at, and make it your own.
Last week I read Late
Rain, by Lynn Kostoff. (Highly recommended, by the way, I’ll have more in
my end-of-the-month summary.) Here, Kostoff takes the hoary concepts of the femme fatale and the burned-out cop and
plays them against each other in a multi-POV story that allows the reader to
know more than any of the characters, which is the best way to foreshadow as I
am aware of: trusting the reader’s intelligence.
About halfway through Late
Rain, something popped into my head: what might Elmore Leonard have done
with this woman, her hapless husband, and controlling father-in-law? The cop
beset on all sides, with a relationship he can’t quite get off the ground? The
lawyer who serves as the town puppeteer and his dim-witted henchman? It would
have been an entirely different book. Not necessarily better—maybe even not as
good—but it would have been Leonard’s book as much as Late Rain is Kostoff’s. Leonard would have made the premise and
characters his own, just as Kostoff made them his own.
We’ve all read books and seen movies where the original premise
draws us in, then the final result is disappointing. We’ve also read and seen
things where the original premise doesn’t seem like much, but we give it a chance
because we like an author in general or the enjoy an actor’s work, only to find
we like it a lot more than anticipated. That’s because what’s a good idea for
one person to develop may be a lousy idea for someone else. The reading public
may be screaming for a story about a transgendered astronaut caught in a love
triangle with a cowboy and a medieval monk; I can’t write that book. Know your
strengths and play to them.
Arnold Schoenberg, the father of twelve-tone music, once
told an acolyte, “There is still a great deal of beautiful music to be written
in C Major.” There are many great lone wolf PI stories yet to be written.
Traditional puzzle mysteries. Organized crime. Femme fatale. It’s not unreasonable to assume, whatever your chosen
genre and style, there’s more that can be done by tweaking the mold for those
who aren’t set up to break it. Find your niche. Make it your own. That’s where
success is most likely to lie.
No comments:
Post a Comment