Went back to some
old reliable authors in June and they came through for me, as usual.
L.A.
Confidential, James Ellroy. The weakest of the three LA
Quartet novels I’ve read so far, but still wonderful stuff. Brian Helgeland and
Curtis Hanson did yeomen’s work converting this sprawling magnificent mess of a
book into a lean, satisfying, and damn near perfect movie. The book shows the
continued evolution of Ellroy’s style: using snippets of police reports and
newspaper articles to show the passage of time, increasingly percussive sentences,
and three-dimensional plotting as everyone schemes around everyone else. That’s
where the problem arises: it’s too much. Credulity is strained and the ending
is so complicated Ellroy has no choice but to revert to the traditional
mystery’s hoary convention of having characters standing around explaining what
the hell just happened. And he has to have them do it twice. Read the book if
you want to get off on the writing. See the movie for a better story.
The
Whites, Richard Price.
There’s nothing about Price’s writing that stands out, which is why I think he
sometimes falls through the cracks in my reading. His style isn’t flashy like
Ellroy’s. His characters aren’t as glib as Elmore Leonard’s. The dialog isn’t
as transcript-ready as George Higgins’s. What Price does best is to do
everything right. His books perfectly balance story and characterization, he
knows exactly how much description to give, and you believe everything in them.
The Whites isn’t as good as Clockers, but few books are.
Rain
Dogs, Adrian McKinty. In
his famous essay “The Simple Art of Murder,” Raymond Chandler wrote, “The
fellow who can write you a vivid and colorful prose simply won’t be bothered
with the coolie labor of breaking down unbreakable alibis.” Chandler never read
Adrian McKinty. (Ray is excused. McKinty wasn’t born until nine years after
Chandler died.) Volume Five of the Troubles Trilogy may be the best yet. Sean
Duffy is still slogging away as the only Catholic cop in Carrickfergus,
Northern Ireland in the 80s and he continues to take his lumps. Not blessed
with Sherlock Holmes’s brilliance, he’s a hard man in his own way, never afraid
to push the buttons he thinks need pushing, but neither is he some Lethal Weapon renegade. Mostly he’s a
guy in a consistently difficult position who is offended that people keep
thinking they can put one over on him. Duffy plugs away until he gets at least
some measure of satisfaction, if not always justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment