Friday picked up
right where Thursday left off, which is not surprising when one considers
Thursday didn’t end for me until 2:00 AM on Friday.
9:30 Fan Guests
of Honor Jon and Ruth Jordan Interviewed by Charles Todd and Caroline Todd
It’s good to remember
people like Jon and Ruth Jordan are the reason there are such things as
Bouchercons. We writers—even regular-sized writers—are only able to get
together because three times as many readers pony up and travel great distances
to visit with us, and few people are more responsible for keeping those fires
stoked than the Jordans. For as much as writers like to complain about
discuss how difficult it is to balance jobs and lives and still find time to
write, I guaran-damn-tee you none of us puts in more time than the Jordans.
They’re charming and unassuming and one would never guess they, and others like
them, are what make everything we get to do possible. The interview covered a
wide range of topics, from Jordan family history to the origins of Crimespree
Magazine to anecdotes about writers they’ve come to know, and they know everybody. A delightful 50 minutes,
though co-interviewer Charles Todd needed coffee badly. Very badly. Bubbles on The Wire never jonesed harder for a fix
than Charles Todd did for his coffee that morning.
11:00 Better Him
Than Me: Criminal Protagonists. Dwayne Swierczynski, moderator.
Dwayne Swierczynski
stepped in when original moderator Todd “Big Daddy Thug” Robinson was unable to
attend. Dwayne never skipped a beat, keeping a first-rate panel moving on a
topic they were all more than qualified for.
John McFetridge
refers to his Toronto series of books that focus on the motorcycle gang the
Saints of Hell as “criminal procedurals.” As one of his characters said, “I don’t
understand serial killers. It’s a crime with no profit.” (Gordon Brown also
fails to see the appeal of fictional serial killers, and thinks it’s the
vicarious danger that appeals to readers.) John also mentioned that killing an
animal is lazy writing if the only purpose is to establish how bad the bad guy
is.
Nik Korpon feels
the same way about rape. Placing women in danger is too easy, and Nik has no
background in how the women feel, which makes it almost impossible to describe
more than half a rape.
Nik also told a
story of author Angel Luis Colon, who used to hang with former IRA guys in New
York City after the Troubles. Colon was later appalled when he realized he’d
been spending enjoyable time with bombers and murderers and had difficulty
reconciling the things they’d done with their apparently genial natures.
Shawn McDaniel
strongly recommends a non-fiction book, The
Sociopath Next Door, as a way to get inside criminal protagonists. Shawn
believes people are drawn to characters like Tony Soprano because of the
character’s passion for what they do.
2:00 On the
Nickel: PIs Jan Grape, moderator.
Sean Lynch, a
former cop who writes a series about PIs who take on police corruption: How
many cops does it take to push a guy down the stairs? None. He fell.
David Housewright
doesn’t think of setting as a character, but as how it forms and informs the
human characters. He’ll let his PI go outside the rules, but there are always
consequences.
Corey Lynn Fayman
once had a PI tell him if he ever came up against a man with a gun in the
course of an investigation, he’d step back and call the police.
Sean Lynch: The
antagonistic relationship often depicted between fictional cops and PIs isn’t
generally accurate. They get along and can help each other 90% of the time, and
it drives him crazy to see cop shows where the cops have only one case at a
time. If a PI has a way to help and isn’t a jerk about it, most cops will be
happy to cooperate. This relationship works both ways as each side utilizes the
better skills of the other. One condition: the PI must agree to share
everything and understand the cop can’t do the same. In his experience, cops
who are dismissive and hostile toward PIs who can help them aren’t usually good
cops in general.
3:30 The Boxer:
Writing Violence. Zoe Sharp, moderator.
This panel differed
from other violence panels I’ve seen as the discussion focused less on the
mechanics of violence and more on the psychology. All of the panelists agreed
they get much more grief from readers over the swearing in their books than
because of the violence.
Sheila Redling: How
does physical size affect your character’s sense of risk or preparation for
violence? Are physically smaller characters more attuned to physical threats?
Sheila Redling
quoting from The Onion: The average man is 5000% less effective at fighting
than he imagines.
Zoe Sharp: Male
authors focus more on the mechanics of sex and violence; women more on the
emotions.
Taylor Stevens: The
middle course is to be inside the character’s head and see what that person is
thinking or experiencing.
Zoe Sharp: You
don’t need to spell out everything that happens. Readers will fill in their own
blanks. (She then referenced the shower scene from Psycho, where at no time does the audience ever see a knife contact
skin.)
Quote attributed to
Dennis Lehane (by who I don’t remember): Everything he knows about writing
violence came from reading the Parker novels by Richard Stark (Donald
Westlake). Zoe Sharp got a lot of pointers from the sparse prose used in Robert
B. Parker’s novels.
7:00 Private Eye
Writers of America Banquet.
The PWA Banquet is
always fun, and this year’s even more than usual. Lawrence Block spoke of his
time as president, and several other long-time members spoke and presented
awards. The evening concluded with the presentation of the Shamus Awards, which
went to:
- Best Private Eye Novel: Brutality
by Ingrid Thoft
- Best First Private Eye Novel: The
Do-Right by Lisa Sandlin
- Best Original Private Eye Paperback: Circling the Runway by J.L. Abramo
- Best Private Eye Short Story: "The Dead Client" by
Parnell Hall (Dark City Lights: New York
Stories)
The lifetime
achievement award went once again to someone who had more than earned the
honor, S.J. Rozan. Congratulations to all the winners, even Joe Abramo, who
beat me for best paperback original. I’d like to hate him, but he’s such a nice
guy, fine writer, and gracious winner I couldn’t be happier if I had won
myself. Well, maybe a little.
Special thanks to
Bob Randisi for not only putting on his standard great party, but for taking
time from his own dinner to make sure The Beloved Spouse and I had a meal that
wouldn’t kill us. I’m not a joiner, but every year I’m reminded how glad I am
to be a part of PWA.
Next Monday on the
blog: Day Three.
No comments:
Post a Comment