Kevin Flynn is a life-long resident of the Washington, D.C. area, and served as a violent crime prosecutor in the city for more than 30 years. His non-fiction book Relentless Pursuit was nominated for an Edgar Award in 2007; Rock Creek is his first novel. Kevin lives with his wife Patrice in Northern Virginia; their two children, Connor and Megan, are lawyers living in New York City.
(Editor’s Note: One Bite ta a Time is
experimenting with interviews that deal more with the writer than the book. For
more information on Rock Creek as a story, here is the link the Amazon page.)
Kevin Flynn: As to the character himself: Shane is flawed and
self-destructive but at the
same time brutally honest – both with himself and
others – and dedicated to his job to the point of obsession. I never went
through in real life what he went through in fictional life. But his sensibilities are my sensibilities,
and his voice is my voice. As you’re no
doubt well aware, writing fiction can be agonizing. But it was a lot of fun to walk Shane into a
scene and have him react to it verbally as I would. He was always my anchor.
OBAAT: Of all the possible topics to write about,
what made you choose this one?
KF: So here’s the origin story.
I wrote a non-fiction book about one of my murder cases and it was
published in 2007. Shortly afterwards a
friend – okay, my agent -- asked what my next book would be: “You must have worked on a high-profile case
that would be a natural basis for the next one.” My first thought was, it took me 10 years to
get this one out to the public, don’t push me to the next one. But my second thought was: In fact, I have worked on a case that drew
national attention. A few years before, a government intern had been killed in
D.C., her body found in Rock Creek Park. A Congressman, her former lover, was a
suspect. The catch was that I couldn’t write about it. The case wasn’t in
court yet. All the details of our investigation were confidential. And I’d come to know the victim’s parents
well, and didn’t want to write any factual account that would seem in any way
to exploit their pain.
So
I went and ran with it.
KF: Anyone who thinks that
writing is easy isn't familiar with the lines of the Irish poet who said,
"Better to get down on your marrow bones and scrub kitchen pavement."
There's also some exhilaration in the process: a more modern writer has observed,
"I hate writing, but I love having written." This novel took a
particularly torturous path in getting to press. When I started writing it I
had never written fiction, had never even taken a fiction writing course, of
any kind. And it showed. The spine of the story is now as it was then,
the characters were as well-developed, and it featured occasionally moving
turns of phrase. But in retrospect I can
see it was often plodding, none of its scenes opened compellingly, and it
lacked propulsive pace. I couldn't even
get my agent – the same one who had prompted me to go forward with this project
to begin with – to put the book out the publishers. And as frustrating as that
was, he was right: It wasn't ready. I did at least four more drafts – maybe
five, I’ve lost count – before it met with his specs, and he put it out, with
no bites. In 2019 he put me on a path that led to another agent who specialized
in fiction, and ultimately a publisher bought it -- only to go into breach and
leave a trail of abusive communications in his wake. Bottom line: I got my
rights back, and the book is coming out in May 2024. My story may be more strenuous than most, but
my research of anecdotal experiences suggests that it’s not all that aberrational.
KF: Yes. I actually worked the process a bit in
reverse. Most published authors go the
route of: Write book, get agent, have
book sold to publisher, publisher edits book.
My route was: Write book, get
editor, get agent, have book sold to publisher.
(Leaving out all of the rancorous after- business with the last
publisher, which came to the water’s edge of litigation.)
KF: I have to say that I quarrel
a bit with the premise. The common
observation is that this is a transient area – and certainly the political
class in D.C. proper is – but I would submit that the population of the DMV as
a whole is no more transient than most U.S. urban areas are (outside the most
provincial, my personal examples being Baltimore, Philadelphia and Boston). But I get the point. And as to the question, did my status as a
D.C. native affect the stimulus and writing of Rock Creek, the answer
is: in every way imaginable.
on – capital of the free world, and small town
-- in a way that would introduce it to the public at large, or at least the
reading public, so they would see it fresh.
I said earlier that when I embarked on fiction writing I was deficient
in some ways, lack of formal training being most prominent. But from trial lawyering I had one thing
going for me, among others. To try a
case to a jury is to tell a story to them, a story that is tethered in truth
and authenticity. And every good story
is grounded in a place, and I had the setting of Rock Creek nailed down
before I even had characters to move about in it.
KF: Here’s the incongruity. I’ve written a book that’s characterized as a
combination of mystery thriller and historical fiction. But I’ve rarely if ever read mystery
thrillers, and I’ve never read – at least in my living memory – any work of
historical fiction.
KF: I don’t know.
No comments:
Post a Comment