I’m a Simon Pegg fan, more for his comedies (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, End of the
World) than his other work. (No offense to his other work, which I’ve heard
is excellent. I just haven’t seen the movies, except for the Star Trek reboot, where he threatened to
steal every time he was in.) Mr. Pegg recently found himself in the midst of a
kerfuffle when he was quoted as saying:
“Obviously, I’m very
much a self-confessed fan of science-fiction and genre cinema. But part of me
looks at society as it is now and thinks we’ve been infantilised by our own
taste. We’re essentially all consuming very childish things – comic books,
superheroes… Adults are watching this stuff, and taking it seriously!
“It is a kind of
dumbing down because it’s taking our focus away from real-world issues. Films
used to be about challenging, emotional journeys. Now we’re really not thinking
about anything, other than the fact that the Hulk just had a fight with a
robot.”
This rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, notably those who
take comic book- and superhero-based movies seriously. Pegg made an effort to
clarify and expand upon his remarks:
Simon Pegg, at his audition for the role of Dennis Lehane. |
“Before Star Wars, the
big Hollywood studios were making art movies, with morally ambiguous
characters, that were thematically troubling and often dark (Travis Bickle
dark, as opposed to Bruce Wayne dark). This was probably due in large part to
the Vietnam War and the fact that a large portion of America’s young men were
being forced to grow up very quickly. Images beamed back home from the
conflict, were troubling and a growing protest movement forced the nation to
question the action abroad. Elsewhere, feminism was still dismissed as a
lunatic fringe by the patriarchal old guard, as mainstream culture actively
perpetuated traditional gender roles. Star Wars was very much an antidote to
the moral confusion of the war, solving the conundrum of who was good and who
was evil. At the heart of the story was an ass kicking princess who must surely
have empowered an entire generation of girls. It was a balm for a nation in
crisis in a number of ways and such was that nation’s influence, the film
became a global phenomenon.
“Recent developments
in popular culture were arguably predicted by the French philosopher and
cultural theorist, Jean Baudrillard in his book, ‘America’, in which he talks
about the infantilzation of society. Put simply, this is the idea that as a
society, we are kept in a state of arrested development by dominant forces in
order to keep us more pliant. We are made passionate about the things that
occupied us as children as a means of drawing our attentions away from the
things we really should be invested in, inequality, corruption, economic
injustice etc. It makes sense that when faced with the awfulness of the world,
the harsh realities that surround us, our instinct is to seek comfort, and
where else were the majority of us most comfortable than our youth? A time when
we were shielded from painful truths by our recreational passions, the toys we
played with, the games we played, the comics we read. There was probably more
discussion on Twitter about the The Force Awakens and the Batman vs Superman
trailers than there was about the Nepalese earthquake or the British general
election.”
I’ve allowed Mr. Pegg to write most of this post because I
agree with him almost completely. (Thank you, sir. Should we meet, the drinks
are on me.) I can understand why the Nepalese earthquake didn’t get as much run
as Batman vs Superman, if only
because how can one be for earthquakes?
Americans seem to be far more interested in Ant Man and Iron Man and Superman
and Batman and (you get the point) than they are in important policy matters
relevant to the 2016 elections. Most Americans content themselves with looking
for candidates’
“gotcha” moments. (Certainly the media do.)
“gotcha” moments. (Certainly the media do.)
Don’t misunderstand me: I love mindless entertainment. In
its place. I can recite Monty Python and
the Holy Grail (Animal House, The
Blues Brothers, Get Shorty, The Big Lebowski…) right along with the films,
and miss few chances to drop lines into daily life. A cards-and-dice baseball
game is among my preferred forms of recreation. The difference is I’m not going
to argue about their cultural significance because there shouldn’t be any.
Too closely embracing cartoonish visions of crime and
corruption and violence trivializes them, thus making it more difficult to take
the real thing seriously. Everyone needs their escapism from time to time,
and—oh, hell, yes—we need it badly now. (Though I could live without some of
the fascist elements of the “Protect us at all costs” school.) Let’s just not
forget that shit needs to get real, too, and it’s not doing that nearly often
enough in popular culture, nor in the discussion of that culture. Leisure time
and recreation are great; I’m as lazy as the next guy. What’s disturbing is how
much effort and how many limited resources are expended on them, to the
detriment of more important things.
I agree too, Dana. Some escapism is good, but we need to be aware of the world that we're in and the complex problems that can't always be solved with superheroes. Cable TV has been grittier thanks to smaller demographics. But blockbusters are for the masses (domestic and international) so much controversial content is watered down so as not to offend and heroes and villains are painted in stark black and white so nobody gets confused with the grays that all of us carry.
ReplyDelete