Angel Luis
Colón is a Derringer and Anthony Award shortlisted author. His published works
include the titles: Pull & Pray, No
Happy Endings, the Blacky Jaguar
series of novellas, the short story anthology; Meat City on Fire (And Other Assorted Debacles), and the upcoming Hell Chose Me (2019).
His short
fiction has appeared in multiple web and print publications including Thuglit,
Literary Orphans, and Great Jones Street. He also hosts the podcast, the bastard title.
Keep up with
him on Twitter via @GoshDarnMyLife
That’s the
party line. What he puts on his website to show how badass he is. Those who
know him know a genuinely funny person (as opposed to those who claim to be
funny and only think they are) who always has a kind word for a fellow writer.
It's been a while since he’s been on OBAAT and I hope it won’t be as long
before he’s back.
** ** **
I don’t
think I’m alone in experiencing that surge of doubt that comes with releasing a
new work into the wild. The piece isn’t good enough, there’s a missed copy
edit(s), or maybe I should have revised that finale one more time—the usual
little grey clouds that pop up when you’re trying to celebrate getting work
done.
Shit, I know
for a fact I’m not alone in that feeling. I see that feeling all over my social
media feeds. Some folks experience it worse than others and everyone has a
different approach in dealing with that added stress.
I’ve read a
few takes lately on the idea of the stress getting to a writer in a way that
ends up
making the very process of creating miserable. Those writers broke down
their arguments and have decided to lean towards quitting (or at least taking a
break). The popular response seems to be questioning the writers’ commitment to
the super serious craft of writing but really, what’s the fucking harm in
letting your brain reset?
I’m not a
fan of the romantic notion that some unseen force compels me to write; that I
am a living Stephen J. Cannell stinger in action (sigh – that’s obscure and
80’s as fuck, here’s the LINK).
I say we
should be allowed to breathe for a bit—even if that means “quitting”.
As writers,
we need to be able to deal with truths. We’re too often consumed with building
a platform or a façade and yes, I understand why: we want to succeed. I also
understand we’re trained to believe that only grinding our fucking fingers to
bloody stumps is the answer. That concept that hard work is proof of
commitment—which, come on, how often do we roll our eyes at success stories we
know aren’t as rooted in hard work as they are in dumb luck or nepotism?
Mental health
is important. A toiling creator is not the creator of great things, no matter
how much we romanticize bullshit myths about Hemingway or Van Gogh. We need to
support each other in all those decisions that do not harm ourselves or others.
If a writer is out there feeling this grind is doing self harm, then we need to
grow a spine and offer our support. Yeah, maybe that isn’t conducive to a
continued life of networking opportunities but that is being a decent human.
As corny as
it sounds, I’m of the belief that we should strive to be decent humans,
especially as writers. We chronicle pain and joy, we foster empathy for the
good and the bad. To kick someone while their down because their current
situation doesn’t align with yours? Come on, y’all. We’re not those kinds of
assholes.
So, support
the writers out there in the throes of doubt the same way you would those
living it up on their success. Endeavor to lift everyone up as best you can.
There is literally no downside to the people in your community succeeding on
their own terms.
Look at
that, and I bet you thought this was going to be all glum and stuff. Made it
into rainbows and butterfly kisses.
Now go buy
my book about family fucking each other over for money.
Note to our younger readers: The device Mr. Cannell is shown with is referred to as a "typewriter."
ReplyDeleteMechanical desktop typewriters, such as this Touchmaster Five, were long-time standards of government agencies, newsrooms, and offices
A typewriter is a mechanical or electromechanical machine for writing characters similar to those produced by printer's movable type. Typically, a typewriter has an array of keys, and pressing one causes a different single character to be produced on the paper, by causing a ribbon with dried ink to be struck against the paper by a type element similar to the sorts used in movable type letterpress printing. Commonly a separate type element (called a typebar) corresponds to each key, but the mechanism may also use a single type element (such as a typeball) with a different portion of it used for each possible character.
You're welcome.
Dana – Thanks for hosting.
ReplyDeleteAngel – Thanks for guesting, and I hear you about the stress.
Also, Dana – I brought an old Smith-Corona to my child’s kindergarten class to show what it was like in the pre-personal-computer days. The kids looked at it like something from King Tut’s tomb.