As usual, I’m a bit late here, but I wanted to get my
thoughts together about the recent International Thriller Writers controversy. Not
even ITW so much, as what this debacle says about writers groups in general.
Writers’ organizations such as ITW, Mystery Writers of
America, Sisters in Crime, etc. do not require two houses of Congress and a
president to set standards for membership. There is no need to content
ourselves with saying how something is terrible and needs to stop, the horror,
the horror, then install window dressing and walk away. It’s time to establish
who our organizations and events belong to. Consequences are in order.
Understanding that lawyers would have to fine tune this,
here’s a proposal for organization membership and event attendance:
- A Code of Conduct for all
members, clearly stated and easily found on the web site. The Code will
cover inappropriate sexual behavior, as well as racist, homophobic,
transphobic, or religious discrimination. The Code shall make clear this
is not a bar to civil discussion of such topics. Context always matters.
- Conference attendees must
check a box to certify they have read and agree to abide by the Code of
Conduct before the system can accept their registration.
- Credible complaints will
be forwarded to a standing committee on conduct, which may do any of the
following after an investigation:
- Nothing. The committee
will inform the complainant of the reasons why. (Example: “You became
uncomfortable after finding yourself involved in a discussion of the
invective used in James Ellroy’s works describing life in the 50s. No one
called you, or anyone else, any of these names. No sanctions forthcoming.”)
- Probation. Prohibits the
accused from attending future conferences for a prescribed period of
time. They are still a member and may participate in other activities
until the probation period is over. Probation can be conditional (“on
probation until the matter is disposed of”).
- Suspension. The accused
may not attend any events, nor enjoy any of the benefits of membership,
for a prescribed period of time.
- Banishment. Permanently
bars the accused from any aspect of the organization. This should apply only
in extreme circumstances, though repeat offenders should also be subject
to permanent banishment.
- Members who are on
probation, suspended, or banned will have their names posted on the
group’s web site. The reasons will remain private, but their names will be
available for those who may attend a conference to which this person still
has access, so people know who to look out for. The Code of Conduct each
attendee must acknowledge prior to registration will clearly include this
provision so there are no misunderstandings.
It’s no longer enough to know there are bad actors out there
and maybe they’ll face some arbitrary consequences if they misbehave. The consequences
have to be clear and public. It does little good to ban someone from
ThrillerFest for sexual misconduct only to keep their name secret so they may
prey on others at Left Coast Crime or Bouchercon.
This isn’t about punishing the guilty. It’s about keeping
everyone else safe. Not just good thoughts and boilerplate platitudes so
they’ll feel safe. Taking action to
actually make them safer. I’m a six-foot-one-inch, 240-pound straight white man.
I have never, not once, felt anything but safe at a conference. Everyone needs
to be able to feel that way. To paraphrase Harry Bosch, “We’re all safe, or no
one is safe.”
I like your thinking on this. It comes from a replace of respecting others, and that includes for their differences. I am a 5'0", XXX lb straight female. I don't have a #metoo story and that's because of the thousands of good men and women I have lived, worked, and played with. It only takes 1 to create a bad story, it takes everyone to create a good one.
ReplyDelete