“Don't ever write anything you
don't like yourself and if you do like it, don't take anyone's advice about
changing it. They just don't know.”
--Raymond
Chandler
This
applies on both the macro and micro level. You’re going to spend a lot of time
with whatever project you select; it better be something you’ll enjoy reading.
And reading. And reading again. I went through my most recent book nine times,
with another pass pending when the edits arrive. How can I expect someone else
to enjoy the read if I felt it a chose to write?
This is
the primary reason I’ve never tried my hand at a thriller. I don’t often read
them. I like more realism than contemporary thrillers tend to provide. I’m not
ripping those who do enjoy them—we’re all entitled to our own tastes—but the
work would be drudgery, which means the reading will almost have to be.
(Editor’s
Note: He does sometimes entertain the idea of writing a satirical thriller, but
he hasn’t even bought it a drink yet.)
The micro
level is just as important. I recently wrote about the inherent conflict
between authors and editors. I stand by everything I said there, but I should
have been a little more resolute myself. I sent an e-ARC to a loyal reader
(yes, I have some) who wrote back to express his appreciation of a particular
line, which I had cut from the final version at the editor’s suggestion. I
liked the original better myself but I didn’t stick up for it. That’s my fault but
it’s okay for two reasons:
1) I
learned my lesson and will not make that mistake again;
2) I was
able to get it changed back before the book went to press.
“Maybe
your books don’t sell because you obstinately avoid the mainstream of public
taste,” id the obvious question.
Maybe.
Probably. So what? Not everyone has the skill set to write in a certain genre
or style. Leonard Bernstein is possibly the greatest musical polymath this
country ever produced. He went to his grave lamenting his inability to write a
hit song, and had great respect for those who could do it. No one is going to
ask Tom Brady to play linebacker; that’s not where his gifts lie. Even if he
wanted to and was young enough to learn the position-specific skills, that’s
not what he was born to do. As Captain Dudley Smith said to Bud White when
White asked if he was going to work cases in the Homicide Division: “Your
talents lie elsewhere.”
I am a
massive fan of Dennis Lehane’s The Drop,
both the book and movie. They’re master classes on how to develop and tell a
story. The movie had a small budget and still lost money in the United States
despite having Tom Hardy (when the movies on either side of The Drop were The Dark Knight Rises, Locke, Child 44, and Mad Max: Fury Road)and James Gandolfini in his final role. Foreign
receipts pushed the film into the black but the money men can’t have been
happy.
This is
what Lehane said about the film in an
interview with Boston Magazine:
“Everybody was always on board to kind of make a gritty, down-and-dirty,
1970s-influenced film. The commercial considerations didn’t override the film.
We didn’t say, ‘Oh, we have to slap on a happy ending,’ or ‘Oh, we have to do
this because market research.’”
I get
that. I love 70s crime movies. That’s
probably why, without any conscious thought or effort, I write novels that
could easily be 70s movies. I’m well aware the population at large isn’t much
interested in seeing films like that anymore. This is my wheelhouse, for better
or worse.
Maybe my
favorite book I’ve written is the standalone I wrote between the Nick Forte and
Penns River series, Wild Bill. It’s
the story of how a mob war in Chicago ruins a large FBI investigation. I showed
it to an agent everyone thought I
should work with. Met her a Bouchercon where she told me she liked the book but
1) No one
cares about Italian gangsters anymore. Maybe if they were Russian.
2) It
needs more unexpected violence.
(She also
didn’t like it enough to send me any of this feedback. I had to find out at the
bar.)
Maybe it did need more unexpected violence to
sell, but that would have been a different book. It did have half a dozen
corpses but they weren’t the point. What mattered was how and why they got that
way.
Could I
have re-written it to accommodate her suggestions? Sure. Would that have
increased its changes for a sale? I think not. I’d be writing someone else’s
book, and I give readers credit for being smarter than that. They’ll know
something is a quarter bubble off level. Wild
Bill was the book I had in me and I wrote it the best I know how. I still
think it’s the best constructed book of the eleven I’ve seen published.
I
sometimes toy with the idea of getting an agent to shop the Penns River books
for a streaming series. My ego is large enough to think they’d make a good one.
What’s tricky is that I’m the square peg in the round hole. I have no
screenplay, so I have to go through literary agents who will look at my sales
figures and pass unless I want to try something else. Down & Out Books lets
me write what I want. The books are better, and I’m happier, because of it.
I hear and agree all the way. My pro writer friend says no one in tradpub wants what I write currently, but back in the 60's or 70's, I'd have been a Gold Medal/Fawcett best-seller. I love the control of Indie, doing my art my way. Don't have to compromise on anything, or give up a vision. Have a real problem novel, and may publish anyway, no matter the "flaws." Just one of many! Then on to the next. Keep doing what you do well, and ignore any naysayers!
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. And I'm with you, too. Where my interests go there seem to be few readers. At least your books are mostly in the same series. I swish all around: over-the-top westerns to mysteries in the 1940s. Just finishing up edits on my next featuring none other than Harry Truman as a lead protagonist. We'll see how it does, but I enjoyed the heck out of writing that book.
ReplyDeleteThank you, gentlemen. Having read each of you, I'll take your comments as buttressing my argument. Whatever the timing or market does to sales, you both can write. Whatever else happens is out of our control.
ReplyDelete