It’s a common topic around elections:
Should writers express their personal opinions publicly?
The traditional wisdom says, “No. It might cost you sales if
you offend a reader or potential reader.”
My thought is, “Has anyone ever done a legitimate, serious
study with empirical evidence?”
I’m willing to bet the answer is no to that, too. Publishers
and marketing firms don’t have anything like hard data to tell why people buy
books, don’t buy books, what marketing works, or what marketing doesn’t work.
Everyone is just supposed to cede the field to their “experience” and
“expertise,” which I have boiled down into a couple of sentences.
No one knows what will sell, but we know what won’t. And
your book won’t.
So I’m not overwhelmed by the It might cost you sales
argument.
Two other thoughts come to mind:
1.
Has anyone ever checked to see if expressing one’s
opinion might increase sales, at least enough to offset those lost by the
people you pissed off? Let’s face it, unless you’re in the Stephen King, Lee
Child, Diana Gabaldon stratus of writers, very few people pay attention to what
you say outside the confines of one of your books. If you tweet or Facebook
discourteous things about MAGA, might that not get the attention of some actual
patriots? If your opinions are pro-MAGA, while they might cost a few readers on
the other side, it could tick up your sales to MAGAites. (Assuming they have
someone who will read the books to them.)
2.
We are all humans and citizens in addition to
being writers. I’ll go so far as to say our humanity and citizenship should
take precedence over our writing. If you’re afraid to speak out because it
might cost you sales, what about if the wrong side wins and the libel laws are changed
to what The Felon would like to see? Or if you books are banned altogether because
the First Amendment doesn’t mean what it used to? How’s that going to work out
for you?
Crime fiction writers are well-known for their empathy. If
our consciences allow us to stand quietly by while injustice is planned and
perpetrated, how much of a conscience do we really have?
Writers, by definition, have a gift for using words. That
gives us an obligation to speak out when we feel something isn’t right, or to pass
along compliments when someone steps up and does the right thing.
We all know the famous poem by Martin
Niemöller:
First they came for the
Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
Well, if you – or anyone you care about – are an immigrant,
person of color, queer, Jewish, Muslim, or a woman of any description, the
MAGAs and their ilk, armed with Project 2025, are coming for you.
Will you stand quietly by and allow the others to be
demonized and marginalized – and worse – until there is no one left to speak
for you?
I’m not. And if that means I never sell another book, I’m
good with it. Book sales have never kept me awake at night. MAGA does.
Thank you.
ReplyDeleteI am so there, Dana. Thanks, bud.
ReplyDelete“ Assuming someone will read the book to them.” 🤣🤣🤣
ReplyDeleteLanny's take:
ReplyDeleteThe problem is ideology. It can make otherwise intelligent people sound stupid.
Was there ever an ideologue occupying any point of the political spectrum that didn’t sound self-righteous in their “protection” of some interest or group deemed more worthy than other interests or groups? Was there ever an injustice done to anybody that didn’t have roots in somebody else’s righteousness? Do you honestly believe colonialists, e.g., Isabella, didn’t believe in the righteousness of their cause, or the Salem witch burners, or the Confederacy, etc.? Was there ever a more serious ideologue than “Tail-Gunner” Joe or a Muslim martyr?
There’s a difference between having ideals and being an ideologue; the former speak and work and subject their stances to intellectual examination and the crucible of debate, while the latter all share one thing in common—intolerant self-righteousness defended by silencing others, including demonization, ostracism, out-shouting, or numerous other modes to which all those who fight to be heard can attest.
Oh, you say, but my ideology is different. Is it? You figure you’re more tolerant or flexible of thought than the principals of the auto-de-fe, eugenicists, the German “victims” of onerous European treaty burdens, et al? There’s an easy tell to self-righteousness—no possibility of being wrong in whole or in part—whereas in fact nothing is certain, not even gravity.
But I’ll grant one thing: self-righteousness feels a helluva lot better than the possibility of being mistaken.
Lanny,
ReplyDeleteI have no argument with anything you said except for the end:
"self-righteousness feels a helluva lot better than the possibility of being mistaken."
Feeling too sure about anything makes me a little uneasy. I'm always aware there may be something I'm missing . Finding out what that is always feels good, as I honest to god try to learn something every day, even if what i learn is that I was mistaken in the first place.
I'm 68. If I were to be stopped from publishing from book sales, I'd either go rogue (self-publish) or forget it and move on to the research I do for other projects. Anybody think I'm worried about my measly book sales? Anybody think I maintain a careful stance. I have two FREE PALESTINE tattoos on my arms and I work at a law firm for another 8 months before I retire. How ANYONE ignores what OUR country is arming in Gaza and Lebanon AND the West Bank is beyond my comprehension. I assume their cowards. They may have reasons they believe are good to remain quiet, but they'll never convince me. I think it was wonderful that Ta-Nehisi Coates, the once darling of the elite left (i.e., the so-called left), put down in words his experience after visiting the West Bank. APARTHEID is what he experienced. The Palestinian people have been experiencing it for 76 years, including countless massacres of their people, the "mowings of the lawn in Gaza," etc. I was an absolute Israel supporter until my wife told me to look into it. I did. 10 years later, 8 of them a very deep dive, and my conclusion is we're now arming a Nazi regime. Zionism=Nazism. FACT. To those afraid of losing their day jobs, I can understand. As regards those fearing their book sales, I say, fuck your book sales. Grow a pair.
ReplyDelete