Patrick H. Moore is a Los Angeles based Private Investigator
and Sentencing Mitigation Specialist who has worked in virtually all areas
including drug trafficking, sex crimes, crimes of violence, and white-collar
fraud. Patrick holds a Master’s degree in English Literature from San Francisco
State University where he graduated summa cum laude in 1990. Prior to moving to
Los Angeles, he was lead vocalist and played rhythm guitar for Crash Carnival,
a San Francisco rock ‘n roll band, and experienced the “naked lunch” of life on
the streets for the better part of two decades.
Since February of 2013, Patrick has been running All Things
Crime Blog, a true crime and crime fiction website, which is one of the most
popular (if not the most popular) true crime blogs in the United States.
27 Days is Patrick’s second Nick Crane novel.
One Bite at a Time: Welcome to the blog, Patrick. It’s a
pleasure to have you. Tell us a little about 27 Days.
Patrick H. Moore: 27
Days is my second published novel featuring Nick Crane as my PI protagonist.
The first Nick Crane story,
Cicero’s
Dead, is a relatively straightforward PI novel in which a lovely heiress
named Jade Lamont hires Nick to find her troubled missing brother. It did fairly
well on Amazon (110 reviews) and many readers enjoyed it, but my problem with
it is that it breaks no new ground in the area of crime fiction. It was self-published
by
Max
Myers at U.S. iNDiE BOOKS.
I was pleased by the fact that Cicero’s Dead was well-received but
troubled by what I saw as its lack of relevance in the age of Trump. This is
what I set out to remedy in 27 Days. So
I came up with a set of “what if’s.” What if Nick Crane brings a serial killer
of women named Frank Constantine to justice only to discover seven years later
that Mr. Constantine was a ranking member of a shadowy group of aristocratic
alt-right domestic terrorists called “the principals.” And what if several
members of the principals including the dread Marguerite Ferguson decide that
Nick Crane is public enemy number one and set out to destroy him? And what if
Marguerite’s team abduct and brainwash Nick’s business partner and closest
friend Bobby Moore as a way to get to Nick? And what if the principals inform
Nick that unless he surrenders to Marguerite in twenty-seven days, they will
ship Bobby off to Scorpion Prison in Cairo where he will be murdered after
being subjected to excruciating torture? Truly, Nick finds himself stuck
between the proverbial rock and a hard place.
Once I had my basic set-up in place,
I decided to make Nick’s task as hard as possible. The U.S. is a big country.
There are lots of places where the well-heeled principals could stash Bobby
Moore. So that was my challenge, or, rather, that was Nick’s challenge––to
locate Bobby Moore, which seemed damn near impossible, and then rescue him,
which was even harder.
Nick Crane is a free-wheeling PI who
has never hesitated to skirt the law when necessary. In 27 Days, however, he is approached by a young, idealistic female
FBI agent named Carrie North who is itching to bring Marguerite to justice, not
for the kidnapping but rather for conspiring to commit acts of domestic
terrorism against the United States. Nick and Carrie are certainly an “odd
couple” and they have their share of disagreements (some of which nearly
culminate in pitched battles), but as the story progresses and the hourglass
empties, they learn to like and trust one another.
OBAAT: This isn’t a typical P.I. story. It’s more like you
put a P.I. story in a blender with a political thriller, which is something I
would not have thought to do, so kudos for that. Was this a P.I. story that
morphed into a thriller as you developed it, or did you have an idea for a
thriller that you thought would be well served by making the protagonist a
private investigator?
PHM: This is a great question, Dana! I think of 27 Days as combining aspects of a PI
novel with aspects of a political thriller. My purpose in attempting to combine
these elements was to create a compelling story with plenty of action and
excitement that also had social relevance while still keeping my beloved Nick
Crane intact as the protagonist. Psychologically, there was no way I could
abandon Nick. And, I liked the idea of breaking new ground by combining a PI
novel with a political thriller. Keep in mind, I’m not capable of writing a
police procedural at this point, and I’m not very interested in writing murder
mysteries. So, on balance, I would say that the hybrid form of 27 Days is largely the result of my
desire to write a socially relevant thriller that did not hesitate to blend
genres while keeping my protagonist intact.
(By the way, I think your recent police procedural White Out, which I read and greatly
enjoyed, does a wonderful job in taking a police procedural and making it
socially relevant by having your lawmen combat a gang of biker white supremacists.
In his latest Franky Dast novel, The Long
Way Out, Michael Wiley does something somewhat similar. Ostensibly a murder
mystery, Mr. Wiley’s novel takes on the specter of racism in the South and the
mistreatment of our immigrant population.)
OBAAT: Nick Crane is a great name for a P.I. (Of course, I’m
predisposed to like PIs named “Nick.”) Where did you get the idea for him,
along with his backstory? How did you choose the name?
PHM: I chose the name Nick Crane because I wanted a strong
and perhaps somewhat traditional PI-type name for my protagonist. What I didn’t
want was a “cute” and/or “creative” name. As I recall, Nick Crane was one of
the first names that popped into my head as I was brainstorming. When I first
started writing the first Nick Crane novel, Cicero’s
Dead, I was very much a beginner in the area of reading and writing crime
fiction. Other than the occasional crime novel here and there, I had really
only read the Dennis Lehane Patrick Kenzie novels, James Lee Burke’s Dave
Robicheaux novels, and some of Lee Child’s Jack Reacher novels. One thing that
these three protagonists have in common is that they are seriously tough and
courageous SOBs. In a sense, out of these three protagonists, Nick is perhaps
most like Robicheaux or Patrick Kenzie in that he has a gentle and caring side
in addition to his strong, masculine persona.
I’m originally from the Midwest, Wisconsin, to be exact,
which is why Nick Crane also hails from the Midwest, in his case Northern
Minnesota and the Iron Range. I chose to give him a troubled and painful past
as a way of explaining why danger follows him like the bubonic plague. Let’s
face it, the dude has issues and they show no sign of going away any time
soon.
Although only a small part of 27 Days takes place in LA, I made it Nick’s home base because PIs
are often associated with Los Angeles and because LA is where I work as an
investigator and sentencing mitigation specialist.
OBAAT: I’ve drifted away from this question over the years,
but a story such as yours always makes me wonder if you outline, make it up as
you go along, or use some middle course?
PHM: This is another great question, Dana! The simple answer
is that I seem to be constitutionally incapable of coming up with the plot of a
novel-length story ahead of time. I wish I could, but I just can’t do it.
Because of this, it takes me forever to complete a novel. Sometimes, I go for
weeks without a single decent idea regarding how to propel the storyline
forward. I seem to do my most effective plotting while in the act of writing
and rewriting. Characters, dialogue, and literary style are easier for me, but
I find plotting to be extremely hard. I tend to believe that a first-rate crime
novel/thriller requires four key ingredients: 1) strong, vivid characters; 2)
lively, believable dialogue; 3) a compelling literary style (I like working in
the first person); and 4) a kick-ass storyline.
OBAAT: As a professional investigator yourself, what things
do you see in others’ P.I. novels that either drive you crazy or make you smile
while thinking “He/She got that right.”
PHM: I would begin by saying that most PI novels and police
procedurals do tend to get most things right. Generally speaking, we crime
novelists work hard at our craft. We want to be as authentic as possible. If
there’s one area where I think some of us sometimes fall short, and this goes
for films and TV series as well as novels, it’s in the area of drugs, drug use,
and how drugs affect people, especially when it comes to heroin. I don’t know
how many times I’ve been reading a novel or story and the writer describes
someone on heroin as having dilated pupils. Now the reality is that heroin and
opiates in general make one’s pupils tiny, while methamphetamines and
stimulants make one’s pupils huge. Every time I encounter this I sigh and think,
‘This author has no business writing about drugs and drug users. He or she has
little knowledge in this area.’
My lack of expertise in the area of police work and police
techniques is the major reason why I have not chosen to attempt to write a
police procedural. I just know I would botch it terribly. Though, in recent
months I’ve read several strong, well-written police procedurals (including
yours, Dana) so perhaps one day I might try writing one.
OBAAT: You have an MFA from San Francisco State. Which got
to you first, the desire to be a writer, or to be an investigator?
PHM: I’ve wanted to be a writer since I was about 15 years
old. I was perhaps the slowest learner in history. My first novel took a full
five years to write and it was flat-out awful. (Editor’s Note: Welcome to the
club that includes damn near all of us.) I cringe on those rare occasions when I pick
it up and read a page or two. Until I turned 30, I worked in manufacturing in
Silicon Valley by day and rambled around the streets by night. I also attempted
to be a respectable autodidact, at which I failed miserably. Around my
thirtieth birthday, several people I respected insisted that I go to college. I
listened. They were right. In college, I worked hard and earned an AA, a BA,
and an MA all in English Literature. I also took lots of creative writing
classes, some of which were very helpful. I wrote a couple of novels during
this period, one of which (a Vietnam story) I hope our publisher, Down &
Out Books, will choose to publish someday.
I had no intention of becoming an actual crime writer until
after I moved to LA and went to work as an investigator and sentencing
mitigation specialist. This is where the pieces slowly fell into place and
after a few years on the job, I was able to combine what I had learned during
my misguided youth on the streets with what I was learning as an investigator.
I’ve had some memorable clients who taught me a great deal by simply recounting
their personal histories.
OBAAT: Your bio describes you as a “sentencing mitigation
specialist.” I have an idea of what that means, but please lay it out for our
readers.
PHM: As a “sentencing mitigation specialist,” my job is to
help our clients, all of whom are facing felony charges––generally of the
federal variety––get “soft landings” when they come before the judge for
sentencing. Let me quickly outline the process: First, I interview my clients
and their relevant family members thoroughly, sometimes for as much as 12 to 20
hours, depending on how much they have to say and how many family members I
need to interview; second, I collect character reference letters written on my
clients’ behalf; third, I fill out a bunch of bothersome forms and, more
importantly, write an extensive Mitigation Letter addressed to the U.S.
Probation Officer. The purpose of the Letter is to persuade the probation
officer to recommend a sentence far below the advisory sentencing guidelines,
based on both the client’s “history and personal characteristics” and whatever
legal issues need to be mitigated. Fourth, I use the Mitigation Letter as a template
for my ultimate task––writing a powerful and persuasive Sentencing Memorandum
in which I try to convince the judge to give our client a break. More often
than not, we are successful in this endeavor. A good result is getting our
client a sentence of half or less than half of what he or she is facing under
the advisory sentencing guidelines.
OBAAT: What’s next for you?
PHM: At the end of 27
Days, although safe for the moment, Nick Crane is hardly out of the woods.
Marguerite Ferguson still wants his scalp and is determined to get it.
Therefore, I’m currently writing the sequel to 27 Days in which Nick attempts to penetrate to the heart of the
principals’ operation, to the “heart of the octopus,” if you will. Its working
title is Giant Steps. As usual, at
this stage of the process, I have only the vaguest sense of where this story
will take us.
I’ve already written a prequel to 27 Days that still needs a little polishing but is nearly ready to
go. Its title is Rogues and Patriots.
This is the story of how and why Nick Crane was originally abducted by the
principals. In it we meet Marguerite and Thomas Quincey and Desmond Cole and
Nick’s part-time girlfriend, the striking Adara Ghaffari. My sense is that Rogues and Patriots should probably be
published before Giant Steps, but we’ll
see what Lance Wright at Down & Out Books thinks when the time comes.
In closing, I want to thank you, Dana, for taking the time
to read 27 Days and for asking such
thoughtful and interesting questions.
.jpg)
