Scheduling Announcement

 I first posted to this blog on August 17, 2008. George W. Bush was president. The Sole Heir was a rising high school senior. The number one film at the box office was Tropic Thunder. The Los Angeles Angels, led by Vladimir Guerrero Sr. and managed by Mike Scioscia, had the best record in baseball.

This is the 1,175^th post. There have been over one million views and 1600 comments; I am grateful for each and every one. In all that time I have only had to delete a small handful of comments (not including spam) because they were disrespectful of another commenter or wholly off topic.

I’ve kept it going because I enjoy writing the posts. I made a conscious decision several years ago to limit all posts to the traditional newspaper column length of 600 – 800 words out of respect for my readers’ time. (Interviews often run longer, as I do not limit what my guests say. The blog is a great way for me to work things out in my head by writing them down. The self-imposed word limit is helpful to my editing skills in general. There is no downside to this blog for me.

Hold that thought.

I retired from my day job on December 31, 2020. The time retirement made available to me to do whatever I wanted bumped into how tightly organized my days had to be when I was working 40 or more hours a week until I realized a while back that I didn’t have much more ‘free’ time now than I did five years ago. Sure, I got to pick how the day was filled, but the day was filled. I found myself fighting for time to do what I wanted to do for fun amid the time spent doing the things I felt I should be doing or needed to do.

That’s not the point of retirement.

I dedicated myself to drop a post every Friday come hell or high water. I wrote post in advance to cover weeks I’d be away. I worked ahead in general in case I became busier than expected. As an example, I’m drafting this post on April 7 for posting April 18. This is the least lead time I’ve had in weeks.

There are two problems with that. Keeping to such a strict schedule allows me to guarantee the most recent post – especially interviews – will live at the top of the page for a full week. That’s nice, but it also means there are topics that come up on social media or at a conference that I don’t get to until the iron has cooled considerably and the world has moved on.

The other problem with that kind of schedule is that it places the cart before the horse. The blog drives my schedule when I should be driving its. In short, it’s become like a job. True, it’s a job I enjoy, and it’s not like I’m spending forty hours a week doing it, but the whole point of retirement is to do what I want to do when I want to do it.

Something had to give.

So this will be the last regularly scheduled weekly post. I can’t say yet whether I’ll post more or less often, only that I’ll post when I feel I have something worthwhile to say. Any writer friends who’d like to do an interview or guest post, you’re always welcome; you know where to find me. I’ll still do the conference summaries and quarterly roundups of my favorite reads. The only thing that will change is the regularity of posting every Friday.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed, commented, or read this page over the past seventeen years. I’d probably write it if no one read it, but the validation I receive here when I see people do read it, and the comments left here and in other social media are more than gratifying. I’m a better writer because of it, and probably a better person for making myself look at things in more detail. I hope some of what I’ve said here about writing has had a positive effect, maybe taught a newer writer a thing or two.

I’ll be back soon. Just probably not next Friday. I’ll be at the Malice Domestic conference and don’t intend to queue anything in advance.

Capitalization and Italics

 Publishers’ style guides are like grammar in that they should aid the reader’s comprehension. The problem is, like with grammar, too often these guides become ends unto themselves and get in the way of the reader’s comprehension and enjoyment.

There are a couple of things that prompted me to write about this. First is the relatively recent move toward not capitalizing certain proper nouns. Let’s look at a couple of examples:

·       A building may have seven floors, but the one on top should be the Seventh Floor, as it refers to a specific floor.

·       You can put a car in gear, but if you’re going to be specific about which gear, it should be Park or Drive or Reverse.

A noun refers to a person, place, or thing. A proper noun refers to a specific person, place, or thing. Proper nouns are capitalized. To do other is incorrect. Not because it’s a rule. Because it’s confusing.

A more recent development is in the use of italics to replace quotation marks in places other than dialog. For example:

Will said, “John told them he was an expert. The fact is, he doesn’t know his ass from his elbow about it.”

This makes the reader think Will emphasized “expert” when he did not. The traditional way, which is also easier to understand on first reading is

Will said, “John told them he was an ‘expert.’ The fact is, he doesn’t know his ass from his elbow about it.”

Readers expect italics to indicate one of four things:

·       Emphasis of a word or phrase.

·       Internal monolog.

·       The title of a book, movie, magazine, or newspaper.

·       A section of a book that is set apart from the rest of the text, such as a flashback scene or chapter.

Using italics in lieu of quotation marks puts the reader in mind of one of these four things and requires her to re-read the section to get the proper interpretation. People should only read a passage twice because they want to savor it, not because it confuses them.

The purpose of everything that goes on the printed page is to convey what the author intended as directly as possible to the reader’s mind. Anything that aids that is fine. Anything that works against that is wrong.

I’ll have more to say on the grammar front next week.

Left Coast Crime 2025

 Travel and prior commitments prevented me from writing about march’s left Coast Crime conference in Denver. I’ll correct that today.

A quick note: I’ve been to over twenty conferences since my first, 2008’s Baltimore Bouchercon. I don’t take as many notes as I used to because each year there are fewer things I haven’t heard. The list below is by no means a comprehensive listing of all the interesting things I heard over that weekend, just those that were new, or of special interest to me.

PIs: Historical & Modern

SJ Rozan: The PI is the embodiment of having to make a difficult decision in an area of moral ambiguity.

Matt Coyle: PIs are the equivalent of the Western gunslinger. Once he’s done the job, he’s not so useful.

SJ Rozan: Short stories are like a liquor story robbery: in and out. Novels are long cons.

Noir: How Dark Can We go?

Christa Faust: Dark humor is a great way to help readers bridge the gap to an unlikeable protagonist.

CF: Hard boiled + Down these mean streets goes a man who is not himself mean. Noir = He’s mean, too.

CF: As an author, it can be hard to stick with a series. “I’m married to this series and I love it. but look at the ass on that idea.”

CF: There’s no level of “how far,” but how you handle it. If a scene can be cut and not hurt the story, cut it. Be as dark as you want, but not just the sake of darkness.

Conversation notes (Christa?):

Let the queer characters be messy. Too many cis writers make them perfect for fear of giving offense, which makes them two dimensional.

Humor can be a protective coating for the queer characters.

Medicine and Forensics:

DP Lyle: DNA is involved in less than 1% of cases.

The Craft of Writing:

Duane Swierczynski: A scene that comes to you right away is likely a cliché.

Rob Hart: Doesn’t want ‘sensitivity readers;’ he wants ‘accuracy readers.’

RH: Does one draft backward so he’s not running out of energy by the end.

Noir: Examining the Dark Side

Jon Bassoff: The reader doesn’t have to like the protagonist; he just has to be interested in him.

David Boop: In noir, the pro is the con.

DB: the reader can only spend so much time in the dark before you lose him. Comedy not only gives the reader a break, it intensifies the next bad thing to happen.

Mark Bacon: Car dealers put GPS and kill switches in cars for people with poor credit so they can keep them from driving the car and find it without bothering with a repo man, This can cause serious problems when a car dies on a busy highway.

Audience member: Postwar noir dealt with PTSD, though it wasn’t called that then. Now (neo)noir is nihilism.

#  #  #

This was my second Left Coast Crime. Both were as well run as any conference I have attended, and I’ve been to more than twenty. If you get a chance to catch one – next year’s is in San Francisco -  you should go. You won’t be sorry.

 

 

An Interview With Charlie Stella, Author of Rapino/Amato

 Charlie Stella is unique, and not just like everyone else. Charlie is much more comfortable talking about his past than I am – it’s his past, after all – but, as you’ll able to divine from his answers here, he knows what he’s talking about when it comes to organized crime. Lucky for us – and probably him as well – Charlie is a talented writer and was able to move into a straight life.

No one has been more encouraging and helpful to me as a writer than Charlie. He’s largely responsible for my first contract and, to give you an idea of what kind of friend he is, he and his lovely wife AnnMarie drove all night from New Jersey to Pittsburgh to attend my first book launch at 9:00 on a Saturday morning. (He did forget the cannoli, though.)

Ladies and gentlemen, a man I’m proud to call a friend of mine, Charlie Stella.

One Bite at a Time: Welcome back to the blog, Charlie. It’s been too long.

Your new book, Rapino/Amato, is a contemporary organized crime story, though half of it revolves around the drug trade in Montana, which is not generally thought of as a hotbed of illicit drug trafficking. What prompted you to go there?

Charlie Stella: We visited Yellowstone a few years back and stayed in a condo a lawyer friend owned in Big Sky. We landed in Bozeman where I bought a few local newspapers with articles about the influx of drug trafficking in Bozeman (Montana in general). It was significant then and more so now. I took a bit of artistic license in making it a distribution center for drugs. I started the novel while we were there during down time (when my legs and back couldn’t handle all the uphill climbing). Montana is really very gorgeous and Yellowstone magnificent. We played a few games in Montana back in college and I can still remember the snow-covered Rockies. Stunning and my kind of weather.

OBAAT: The other half of the book is set in New York and deals with a mafia that is clearly in decline, though no less ruthless in its ways. Was it harder to keep the story together, now that the mob has such frayed edges? (Not that I’d want to fool with them.)

CS: I thought I should have something mob-related since the protagonist came from that background. It is pretty funny when you think about those who flipped and what they are doing these days. They are all over the internet with their own podcasts. They argue with one another through their podcasts. One of them calls it the mob soap opera. That is a perfect description and a testament to how weak the mob has become. There are those who stood their ground and did ten, twenty, twenty-five, and/or life. Now, tell someone facing those kinds of numbers while they’re in their twenties or thirties and it takes a very strong mind (some might say stupidity) to stay the course and do the time. As long as they can allow someone to kill nineteen people (I “think” that’s the high watermark set by Gravano) to do a short bid, then get himself in trouble with drug charges, then let him out again to do a podcast … it’s even worse than pardoning the violent offenders of January 6. It is abominable, but extremely effective. The ruthlessness in the book is from desperation and a touch (or more) of paranoia. I often wonder if those kinds of pardons softened the average American for the kind of pardons we’re seeing from Presidents. Despicable, really, and something that needs to be overseen and never will be overseen.

OBAAT: You have always been a master at describing the lives of what I think of as ‘minimum wage’ mobsters, the entry-level people, knockaround guys, and wanna-bes who do a lot of the dirty work for the captains and bosses. What is it about these guys that appeals to you as a storyteller?

CS: The associates have different classifications (to my mind) and some earn quite a bit of coin, but most are involved for what little money they can make to improve their lives, pay their bills, etc. Once an associate is spoken for, their standing is more legitimized by mob standards, but there are those on the outer fringes (guys hustling football tickets, selling swag, etc.) who might be associates to “[speak] for” associates, if that makes sense. Essentially, they are guys who were not spoken for but are still earning and connected through a friend who is spoken for. I was spoken for with the stuff I did and within a few years very anxious to exit. The money allowed me to provide for three households, but the closer one gets, if he still has functioning brain cells and most importantly, other options, the quicker one will retire and either write about it or find something better to do with themselves. I met my wife at a turning point for me. Getting too close via someone else. She wasn’t going for it, so I wrote a book to impress her, found an agent, was published and I was done. Listen to me, the pay cut was serious and I’m still working today.

OBAAT: This may seem like it’s out of left field, but when I read your stuff I often think of Joseph Wanbaugh’s police procedurals. He writes about cops of varying levels of competence and character who are routinely beset by idiotic or manipulative bosses. Substitute ‘mobsters’ for ‘cops’, and your books are similar. Who are the primary influences of your writing, whether authors, TV, or movies?

CS: George V. Higgins characters across the board. He did the same thing with the Boston underworld, and nobody ever did it better. A few personal experiences occasionally sneak in my works but those are mostly comical things that to this day make me smile when I think back to them.

OBAAT: The other author who comes to mind when I read you is George V. Higgins, which most readers already know means I’m going to ask about dialog. Like Higgins, no one writes dialog that sounds more like people talking than you, and, also like Higgins, sometimes what’s important in a conversation is concealed in what may seem like two guys bullshitting. How do you go about crafting effective dialog?

CS: Your dialogue is also Higgins worthy, so never dodge that compliment. The western, Dead Shot, is masterful dialogue and from a different era. I guess (and don’t know) it has to do with listening or hearing (maybe subconsciously) the patterns of speech around us. That audio I sent you of Lefty Ruggiero and Joe Pistone (Donnie Brasco) tells you how much effort Pacino put into the Lefty role. And those are always funny when they’re not terrifying (Left vs. Gotti from prison, say). They were filming Donnie Brasco while I lived in Little Italy. Usually, I start with what is straight, normal dialogue and then reread it as the character should sound. Rewriting is much of the deal.

OBAAT: Your attitude toward federal law enforcement agencies can safely be described as less than charitable. Leaving aside whatever is going on in Washington as we’re talking today, what would you change about how the feds go about their business, notably as it concerns organized crime?

CS: I read a book about the Dulles brothers last year. Their influence continues to shape our insane foreign policy on both sides of the political aisle to this day (regime changes, overt or clandestine). What the Dulles boys did around the globe makes going after drug runners pale by comparison. It’s the old power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely, thing. It’s very hard, I think, to change that when a badge on any level holds so much power. Cops are no different than any mob. They stick together, have fragile egos, are very patriotic (believe it or not), and sometimes that combination leads to stupid shit. It has to be the hardest job in the world to remain clean and not yield to peer pressure, and just like the mob, when they get in trouble, the backflip is usually fast. I don’t know how to change what comes natural to people in general, especially in local law enforcement, but at the CIA/FBI/SS level, it might not be a bad idea to have term limits on their careers. The Secret Service clowns in the car with President Bozo on January 6, 2020, the lying that ensued still sticks in my craw.

OBAAT: Just when a lot of people think the vein of stories about Italian organized crime has been tapped out, you come up with a new angle, as in Rapino/Amato. Knowing you as well as I do, I see no reason this will stop. What are you working on now?

CS: A novel about a young woman who decides to enter a life of pornography. The research has been fascinating (not watching porn videos but reading and listening to interviews with the male and female talent, producers, et al), learning how they get into the business, the struggle it actually is, and that some of the stars literally went into it after careers as nurses, real estate agents, a military sergeant, etc., but for the new kids on the block, it appears to be very competitive and that’s what the new book (without a title, which is an anomaly for me) is about. The lowest of the low associates are involved until a critical point and then a made guy steps into it. Stark House has another book they bought of mine that isn’t mob related. That one, Raskin’s World, is about lawyers having affairs and ending with a tragic event. We moved it back because Rapino-Amato is a sequel to Joey Piss Pot. The last two years have been my most productive ever. I really can’t wait to retire like you but being so much younger, I’ll have to wait another six or seven months. (Editor’s Note: I am 137 days older than Master Stella.) Thanks for this, as always.

PS: Rapino/Amato releases today, April 4.)

 

Ken Bruen (1951 - 2025)

 In December 2009 I was fortunate enough to be able to interview the late Ken Bruen for the New Mystery Reader website. here is that interview.

Irish crime fiction has assumed an importance out of all proportion to the size of the island in recent years. No one has been more responsible for this than Ken Bruen. He’s written series (Jack Taylor, Inspector Brant, Fisher and Petrakos), standalone novels (including the newly re-released London Boulevard), and has collaborated with other well-known writers (Reed Farrel Coleman, Jason Starr), as well as contributing to more than a few anthologies, and editing one (Dublin Noir). Television and movies are lining up to bring his work to screens of various sizes.

 

He’s won two Shamus awards (for The Guards and The Dramatist), a Macavity (The Killing of the Tinkers), and a Barry (Priest); he’s been a finalist for two Edgars, two Anthonys, a Macavity, and a Barry. He still took time for questions from New Mystery Reader’s Dana King.

 

NMR: Ken, thanks for taking the time to answer some questions. London Boulevard has been re-issued to coincide with the release of the movie, starring Colin Farrell and Keira Knightley. The story itself is a twist on the classic film, Sunset Boulevard, with the Joe Gillis character re-worked into someone more likely to be found in a Richard Stark novel. What gave you the idea of adapting it as you did?

 

KB: I love the movie and I wondered if it would be possible to update it and when I was told it was a crazy idea, then I knew I had to do it and it was a challenge to move it to London and set in modern era..........it was one of the books that was a joy to write.

  

NMR: In Sunset Boulevard, Norma Desmond is a hag, but London Boulevard’s Lillian Palmer arouses Mitchell when he first meets her. Is this a reflection of changing attitudes toward older woman, your personal attitudes toward older women, or was it just to make the plot more credible?

 

KB: Purely a plot device but that is not to say that older women aren't amazing, though I think the term Cougar is pretty demeaning.

  

NMR: Is there anything you can tell us about the movie? IMDB cast information implies at least one pretty major change, which I won’t go into, lest I create a spoiler.

 

KB: It looks absolutely stunning and yes, there are 2 major plot changes but it would be indeed a spoiler to say.............the London locations are amazing and I think it's going to do terrific...............I sure as hell hope so.

  

NMR: In addition to London Boulevard, you currently have several books under consideration for movies or TV shows. How involved are you in the productions? Would you like to be involved more? Less? Overall, is it an enjoyable experience?

 

KB: Blitz and The Guards are both finished and I was in both.........played a priest in Blitz!!!!! Loved it and they did ask me about various script points and it was fun to be so involved in both productions.

  

NMR: You’ve written several series, as well as standalones. Do you have a preference? Do you write a book knowing in advance whether it will be a standalone, or the first in a series, from the time you start? 

 

KB: Jack Taylor and Brant were always meant to be series..............American Skin and Once Were Cops are still unclear in my head as to whether they are better left as standalones. I like the series as it's like re-visiting family, though highly screwed families.

 

NMR: Are there topics or types of plots you prefer to do as part of a series rather than standalones, or vice versa?

 

KB: It's interchangeable but in standalones, you can go for broke, kill everybody and not have to worry about the next book, no boundaries and I love that.

 

NMR: You’ve written several collaborations with two different authors and have gone on record as enjoying the experience. What drew you to work with someone else? What was it about Jason Starr and Reed Farrel Coleman that attracted you?

 

KB: Very simple, they are me best mates and what could be better than working with your buddies.............would you believe Dana, never one fight or argument on any of the projects, I always wanted to do collaborations as the general feeling is they don't work and I found the opposite to be true, if writers have huge egos?............then they sure weren't in evidence on any of the books, it was just a blast, and I relish the challenge of finding a new voice.

 

NMR: Few writers have a more easily recognizable style; your pages even look different from most. The net effect is to keep the reader’s eye moving down the page, and, as a result, your books read like water over a dam. How much of this comes from conscious decisions you’ve made, and how much is just how things come out naturally when you write?

 

KB: I used to write a lot of poetry, most of it crap but it taught me brevity and outline, I see a page in my mind and I write it exactly as I see it, it has caused murder with editors alas but when I see the books, and the pages as they are in my mind, it was worth the struggle 

 

NMR: You’re an admirer of the late Ed McBain, who seems relatively forgotten since his death. When discussing the greats, Chandler, Hammett, the two Macdonalds, Elmore Leonard, and James Lee Burke always come up; when someone asks, “What about McBain?” the answer is, “Oh, of course, McBain,” but he’s no longer among the first listed. Why do you think that is, and do you think the pendulum will swing back for him?

 

KB: I was blessed to know him and even do a reading with him. He will always be mega and every few years there will be a huge upsurge of interest in him, I'm always amazed that so little is made of his wondrous humour, Fat Ollie Weeks is one of the great comic creations in mystery

 

NMR: Who are your major influences as a writer?

 

KB: James M. Cain, Harold Mc Coy, Beckett

 

NMR: I understand you try to read a book a day. Who and what do you like to read?

 

KB: Jason Starr, Daniel Woodrell, James Sallis, RJ. Ellory, Craig McDonald, Donna Moore, Reed Coleman and I do a lot of reading on Philosophy as my Doctorate is in Metaphysics

 

NMR: Some of our readers may be unfamiliar with your work. Which of your books do you think gives the best flavor of your writing while being most accessible to those who may not know what to expect?

 

KB: The Guards.............I think it's the best intro to the whole way I write.

 

Many thanks to Ken Bruen for his generosity of time and spirit; this interview has truly been a pleasure. So we can’t be accused as teases about the movies, London Boulevard is scheduled for UK release in April of 2010; Blitz for a less definite 2010 date. The Guards is too recently completed to have a release date, and Once Were Cops  is currently in development.

 

Winter's Favorite Reads

 Within Plain Sight, Bruce Robert Coffin. The fourth in the outstanding Detective John Byron series shows Coffin’s skill at weaving an intriguing story around the lives of police officers is undiminished. The procedure is tight but never steps on the story’s momentum or the interplay between the characters, which exists on multiple levels.

The Two-Bear Mambo, Joe R. Lansdale. Hap and Leonard Number 3 was used as the third, and, alas, final season of the Hap and Leonard TV series. No one describes serious, sometimes tragic, situations with more inherent humor than Lansdale, which makes even the most fraught sequences bearable. (No pun intended.) Some of the philosophical digressions go on a bit long, but Hap and Leonard are always worth a read.

Ocean Drive, Sam Wiebe. Wiebe set PI Dave Wakeland aside for a bit to write this multi-POV cop and crook novel and pulls it off with such aplomb you’d think this was all he wrote. As always, the plot is tight and believable, the characters are three-dimensional in ways that support the flow of the story, and the dialog falls on the ear like you’re eavesdropping. Weibe started off very good and keeps getting better.

Blind to Midnight, Reed Farrel Coleman. Book 2 of the Nick Ryan series delves a little more into character and the world is a better place because of it. The problem I have with high-octane thrillers- books or movies - is the incessant quest to raise the stakes, makes them too unbelievable. Coleman tethers his book to how individuals will be affected, and for them this is life and death. Let’s hope this series continues.

The Devil Raises His Own, Scott Phillips. Like all his books, only Scott Phillips could have written this. Raunchy, violent, and laugh out loud funny, Phillips weaves multiple characters and storyline into what becomes a unified whole by books end. Not for those easily offended by foul language, but that’s your loss.

The Other, Jeff Markowitz. I’d been waiting for this one since I learned Markowitz was working on it; he didn’t disappoint me. Parallel stories that take place ninety years apart and focus on two Nazi youth camps in New Jersey built on the same site. Things weren’t as bad when Markowitz started the book as they are now, which makes his writing eerily prescient.

Liar’s Dice, Gabriel Valjan. The Shamus winner for Best Paperback original last year and a worthy recipient. Valjan sets his stories in Boston of the late 70s and early 80s; I went to grad school in Beantown 1983 – 1986 and lived in the area for an extra year, so much of what he writes hits a sweet spot with me. meticulously researched, Valjan pulls together several stories. Some relate to each other; some don’t. All effectively show what few stories od, which is that even private eyes are often pulled in multiple, and sometimes conflicting, directions.

Rapino/Amato, Charlie Stella. The Godfather is back and in good form. A sort-of-sequel to last year’s excellent Joey Piss Pot, Rapino/Amato spreads the new York mob’s reach to Montana, where a convicted mobster is working for an unnamed federal agency. Meanwhile, tensions are running high in New York as the creaking mob hierarchy tries to adapt to life in the 21^st Century. Stella’s keen ear for dialog is unsurpassed and he weaves two disparate stories together with the skill of a master.

A Rented Grave, Charles Philipp Martin. This book stands as evidence why you should make yourself available to moderate panels at conferences (in this case left Coast Crime), and read at least one book by each author. I’ll confess to not having been aware of Martin until I started prepping for the police procedural panel at this year’s conference. I’ll keep my eyes open for more. Think 87^th precinct in Hong Kong. Outstanding work by a writer who knows how to stay out of the way and still contributes the great lines.

The Menace of the Years, Frank Zafiro. Outstanding police procedural that not only handle procedure with aplomb but also police policy, politics, and personal lives. The dialog flows and is appropriate to each character, with humor used as it should be. An all-around enjoyable and enlightening book the late Joe Wambaugh would approve of.

Et tu, Editor?

 “The world is a hellish place, and bad writing is destroying the quality of our suffering.” ― Tom Waits

Contemporary editing doesn’t kick any ass, either.

I have long said the Internet needs editors. Without the space restrictions imposed by newsprint or magazine pages, even professional journalists tend to yammer on well past the point where anyone cares what they’re saying. This is why I make every effort to keep these posts to between 600 – 800 words, the standard length of a traditional newspaper column. (Interviews tend to run longer depending on the subject’s responses.)

As for the quality of what editing takes place, even venues with professional editors are guilty. To use a trivial example that most clearly shows the point, ledes are routinely buried these days. I first noticed this when reading the sports pages, where one can sometimes go several paragraphs before learning the score of the game, which is the first thing people look for when they read a recap.

It's in novels where this really irritates me. The last several books I’ve read are rife with the kinds of errors writers may make through having too tight a deadline, or simple copy and paste errors that, frankly, are the sole reasons copy editors exist. While I do not excuse the writer altogether – after all, it’s our name on the cover – editors might want to do a better job, considering how much we hear about their importance.

A few examples from my recent reading:

·       “Anything under .50 is small caliber.” Really? A .50 caliber machine gun is what they used in World War II to shoot down fighter planes. Currently, the Desert Eagle, often considered the most powerful handgun in the world (Dirty Harry notwithstanding) is a .50 cal. Correct me if I’m wrong, but “small” caliber handguns are .22s and .25s; maybe a .32. A .38 or a 9 mm is not a small caliber weapon.

·       Speaking of 9 mm, it’s ‘nine,’ not ‘point nine,’ which is how one has to read the ever popular ‘.9 mm.’ A .9 mm bullet would have a diameter of 0.035 inches, which is about 3/64 of an inch, or about the size of the tip of a dart. It had better hit you someplace critical if it’s going to do much damage.

·       Using the same word or phrase too close together and/or too often. I confess to being prone to this one myself and spend much of my editing and rewriting time seeking them out for correction. They happen most often during revisions when the author cuts, copies, or rewrites a sentence or paragraph and loses track of what exactly is where. Again, the author should catch that, but authors are focused on creating; the editor’s sole purpose is to catch these things.

·       Scenes or conversations that cover the same information multiple times. Again, I often do this in first drafts, as I’m not sure which I like better and know I’ll be by here again. Once again, this is the author’s responsibility, but pointing out such things is what the editor is paid to do.

·       Last, and maybe most egregious, I recently read a book where the tenses changed erratically throughout. I understand this in dialog; some people talk that way. The narrative tense needs to be consistent, certainly within a paragraph.

I was lucky when working with a publisher. Most of my books were edited by Chris Rhatigan and are better because of his efforts. Over time he came to recognize my stylistic choices and either stopped ‘correcting’ them or made suggestions as to the passage could be improved.

Publishers do less for authors all the time. The least we should be able to expect is a professional editing job. I could guess why it’s not that way, but I would be guessing, and my guesses would not be flattering.

Oh, yeah. This one came in at 663 words, including this sentence. Down from 798, thanks to judicious editing.