The Princess Bride
(1987). A delightful film in every way. A fine cast (Cary Elwes, Robin Wright
(her film debut), Mandy Patinkin (his best performance), Wallace Shawn, Peter
Falk, Fred Savage, Andre the Giant (perfectly cast), Christopher Guest, and
cameos from a wide range of comedic talents, led by Billy Crystal and Carol
Kane), hamming things up just enough, which is harder to pull off than one
might think. Rob Reiner’s unobtrusive direction allows William Goldman’s
screenplay (adapted from his novel) to sing in all its silliness. I can’t
imagine there has ever been a better screenwriter than Goldman, as his range is
as impressive as the quality: Harper,
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, The Hot Rock, All the President’s Men,
Marathon Man, A Bridge Too Far, Magic, Misery; thirty-one in all.
The Insider
(1999). Michael Mann is a master stylist as a director, and is generally able
to keep his glossy approach from overwhelming the film itself. The Insider is a prime example. Based
on—and pretty faithful to—an article by Marie Brenner about how the tobacco
cover-up was broken, the screenplay by Mann and Eric Roth does a good job of
staying on the right side of melodrama, shooting more for outrage over the
situation than sympathy for the protagonist. (Not that he doesn’t deserve it.) Russell
Crowe, Al Pacino, and Christopher Plummer put on an acting clinic, and Pacino
keeps things reined in for one of his better performances. (Plummer is eerie as
Mike Wallace.) Worth watching—or re-watching—on its merits as a film, even more
so as an exploration of how moneyed interested game the system.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412e7/412e7f529d53ffc2df4a2393ca8df50eac3cff5e" alt=""
A Walk Among the
Tombstones (2013). Something about this didn’t work for me. It’s hard to
put my finger on. Liam Neeson was great, as always. No one does the tortured
soul better than he. The filmmakers worked in Matt Scudder’s back story very
well. Casting and acting were good throughout. The plot was compelling.
Something about the premise never quite registered with me. Maybe it’s as
simple as the core story revolving around killing women in gruesome manners yet
again. We’re told how the bad guys come into the information they have that
sets the plot in motion, but something about it never quite rang true for me.
This is often a problem when adapting novels, where the author has time to lay
things out; movies are more compressed. (Note: I have not read the book, so I
don’t know if I’d have the same problem there.) It’s a situation where the
whole is less than the sum of the parts. I liked it, but thought I’d like it
more.
2 comments:
A WALK didn't work for me either. And for some unexplicable reason I have never been able to enjoy PRINCeSS BRIDE. I regard that as a great failure on my part.
Just recently watch Walk Among Tombstones. Not what I was hoping for. I didn't feel that it really embodied the feel of a Matthew Scudder book. But I don't think the Scudder novels are the best for adapting--they are more character driven than plot driven, and Hollywood loves a heavy plot. This movie tried to find a balance, but they failed. I'm in the same boat as you--I liked it, but not as much as I thought I would.
Post a Comment