My friend Benoit Lelieve recently posted a review of the movie Tar on his Dead End Follies blog. My response was that he and I would have to agree to disagree on this one. He loved it; I thought it was three hours of my life I’ll never get back, though it seemed longer.
I’ve read enough of Benoit’s work to know that if we
disagree I should probably take another look to see what I might have missed. Fair
warning: what follows is less a review of Tar than of my thought
processes and sensibilities.
The film is the story of the internationally-renowned
conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic and the tribulations of a career dedicated
to producing art at the highest level. We’ll talk more about that later.
I didn’t hate everything about Tar. An early scene
shows Lydia Tar (Cate Blanchett) running a master class for young composers and
explaining the facts of life to a student who can’t be bothered with Bach,
basically because Bach had too many kids. She explains that he will severely
limit himself as a musician to ignore such a giant of the art, and also tells
him why. She does it in an inexcusably harsh and belittling manner, but her
sentiments are spot on.
I also liked the ending, where she [spoiler redacted].
The production values and acting are outstanding. There was
also a good line where she describes herself as a “U-Haul lesbian.” I laughed
out loud at the reference to Charles Dutoit and the Montreal Symphony, as I
have some inside knowledge of what happened there.
That covers what I liked.
What didn’t I like? Pretty much all the characters,
especially Tar, who is a narcissistic bitch who not only thinks the world revolves
around her, but that this is her due because of her genius. She treats
everyone, including her daughter, hideously, often just because she can get
away with it.
Those around her don’t come off much better, as they’re
either duplicitous, toadies, or objects of sympathy. There’s no one to like in
this movie, and few to even empathize with for more than a minute or two.
Why does this bother me so much? A lot has to do with my
upbringing. I was raised working class. Had an aptitude for music and earned
both Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees, my Master’s from New England Conservatory.
I was good, but not good enough to play at that level. To use a baseball
analogy, I was a solid AA player. I did some things very well, but there were
holes in my swing that prevented me from making The Show. I learned much about
art, but through the prism of working-class craftsmen.
While not all craft is art, there can be no art without
craft. The greatest musicians still routinely practice their scales and other
fundamentals. Artists work on their brush technique. Dancers hit the gym to
keep their bodies tuned. Art results from the mastering of craft combined with
a divine spark one either has or does not, which allows the craft to reach a
level that transcends its origins. Spend enough time with artists of the
highest order and you’ll see this is true.
What breaks my balls about Tar is the multiple layers
of pretentiousness it includes. Lydia presents herself as a servant of art, but
the primary thing we see her do artistically is to have the opening trumpet
solo of Mahler’s Fifth Symphony played offstage. No one wrote more detailed
instructions in their scores than Mahler. If he wanted the trumpet off stage,
he would have said so. He did say so in the First Symphony, where the trumpets
play three fanfares off-stage before joining the rest of the orchestra. The
only purpose moving the trumpet off-stage will serve is to generate critical
buzz regarding Tar’s “brilliance.” (There are also logistical issues I’ll not
go into here.)
The film suffers from much the same pretentiousness. In some
ways it reminded me of The Power of the Dog, where a good story was
crushed beneath the weight of its too obvious efforts to be “artistic,” or,
worse, “important.”
I am not immune to art. While I abhor melodrama that tries
to manipulate my emotions, I am moved by many books, movies, and music. The art
must be organic, springing naturally and without effort from the mastering of
the craft, something that rests transparently on the spirit that gives it rise.
(Props to Kierkegaard via David Milch for teaching me that.) A presumed artist
can no more force art into a project than he or she can decide to be taller.
Lifts can be added to their shoes, but close examination reveals the artifice.
Just as melodrama tries to manipulate your feelings, Tar
beats you over the head with its “art” rather than trusting the audience to
decide whether it is, isn’t, or just the auteur engaging in three hours
of cinematic masturbation.
No comments:
Post a Comment